Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The test is whether words have been published (or are threatened to be published) which would tend to affect in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards the claimant. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by Brett Holubeck
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) to determine “[w]hether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
When I was with you two years ago, I quoted President Franklin Roosevelt when he signed the first of the foundational securities laws in 1933: “This law and its effective administration are steps in a program to restore some old-fashioned standards of rectitude. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
” Again, there were 69.8 million people hired between October 2018 and October 2019. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
Todd Heath sued Wisconsin Bell under the False Claims Act, alleging that the company charged schools and libraries impermissibly high prices under the E-rate program, thereby rendering each reimbursement request a false claim. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  [W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Advocate, Shannon Price Minter worries about the effect of Kavanaugh’s appointment on “LGBTQ people and other vulnerable groups. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 11:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Relying on precedent finding that internet communications are not confidential (see People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
  This was what did for Ms Preece in the recent case of Preece v Wetherspoons. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Brett Trout
” citing Gottschalk v. [read post]