Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 8,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
Good news if you have stock in the United States - boy can that country buy low. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 am
Andrei Iancu’s nomination to be the next Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has now been delivered to the Senate. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Liquidation is provided for in the United States under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code while Reorganization is covered under chapters11, 12 and 13 says California Bankruptcy Attorney Steven C. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:51 pm
In this blog post we share with you some good news regarding the continuing flexibility policy being followed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for applicants who have received a Request for Evidence, or Notice of Intent to Deny between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, as well as new guidance for FY 2021 H-1B cap-subject petitioners, whose petitions were rejected or administratively closed solely because the requested start date was… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:23 pm
With Harris County being the third largest county in the United States, there is a large number of attorneys, judges, and citizens who use the law library for various reasons. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Bielski, Case No. 22-105 (oral argument Mar. 21, 2023, in the Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
Noting that one of the planning board members stated: "people living in a particular neighborhood know more about the physical conditions of where they live than any experts brought in by an applicant," the Court concluded: "There is no dispute that petitioner met its initial burden of demonstrating that the proposed project 'compli[ed] with any legislatively imposed conditions on an otherwise permitted use' ... [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
Noting that one of the planning board members stated: "people living in a particular neighborhood know more about the physical conditions of where they live than any experts brought in by an applicant," the Court concluded: "There is no dispute that petitioner met its initial burden of demonstrating that the proposed project 'compli[ed] with any legislatively imposed conditions on an otherwise permitted use' ... [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
Indiana, Cause No. 17-1091 before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:11 pm
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service recently provided a real gem. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
” Even here, Kennedy points to the ongoing friction this suit has caused between the United States and Jordan as a motivation for resolving the issue completely. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
United States, NMCCA No. 200501108 (N-M. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:22 am
United States, NMCCA No. 200501108 (N-M. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 3:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Petitioner Andre Martello Barton is a lawful permanent resident who is a native and citizen of Jamaica. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm
In this habeas case from South Carolina, the petitioner was convicted of drug distribution in state court. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick discusses a new court order that prohibits the government from enforcing a final rule that sought to increase filing fees for certain applications and petitions filed with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am
So why did the United States Supreme Court accept this case for review? [read post]
