Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 7,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:50 am
Related posts: KSR the 5th Anniversary: One Supremely Obvious MessOn Monday, April 30, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued its final decision in the matter of KSR v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
GoogleOn Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
On 2 May 2023 Collins Rice J heard a case management hearing in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:30 am
The decision letter stated: “As you are aware Westminster is currently suffering from a severe shortage of both temporary and permanent accommodation. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Thomas Merrill (Columbia), whom readers might remember as a guest-blogger from a couple of years ago, and who is the author of The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise, and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State (2022): Last week, the Supreme Court heard nearly four hours of argument about the Chevron doctrine—including whether it should be cast aside. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:50 pm
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Rejects “Reasonable Person” Standard for Determining Criminal Responsibility for Threatening Another – Elonis v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm
You've no doubt heard that the Supreme Court is considering a case that could overrule Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
Relevance of Subjective Intentions In the case of Elonis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:02 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
In the Amalfitano case, the Amalfitano's attorneys reference legislation promulgated in 1275.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to the Court of Appeals concerning the application of Section 487 of the Judiciary Law insofar as it provides that:"[a]n attorney or counselor who: . . . is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party . . . [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:36 pm
Last month, the United States House of Representatives passed the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, or the “FAIR Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
P. 60(b)”); United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
United States, a case I discuss below about a 1998 U.S. missile strike on a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
The following essay, part of our Race and the Supreme Court program, is by Gail Heriot, a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights and a professor of law at the University of San Diego. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:25 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Hernan Arquimides Ramos v. [read post]
