Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 12,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:09 am
Indeed, as shown below, often a us-v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Lee v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
In Dolgencorp, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:21 pm
In Nexans Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 3:21 am
I cannot wait to see what they come up with next. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:51 am
There can be a waiting period between 6 months up to 10 years after the criminal case is finished. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 10:12 am
There can be a waiting period between 6 months up to 10 years after the criminal case is finished. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
But property rights advocates should not wait for the Supreme Court to solve this problem. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
Castro v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:28 am
Gardner and State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Employees who are unjustly dismissed cannot simply sit back, relax and wait for their payday in court. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Hurst v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
See Wright v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:36 pm
In March, the Supreme Court in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The surveillance state did indeed come, but not from copyright but from the internet companies. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
New York Appellate Division, Third Department: Hastings v Sauve It’s after 1:00 AM. [read post]
