Search for: "parts-76"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 3,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
Election officials "shall not allow any person to pass to the part of the room where the machine is situated, except for the purpose of voting. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 2:42 pm
They lost some ground in 1938-- in part due to unpopularity over court packing, in part due to a deteriorating economy-- but they did not lose control of either house of Congress. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 8:07 am
Part of the answer is in the narrow way that Congress has defined torture. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
Danishefsky contends that the research on 5'-AMP and nucleocidin should not be considered to be part of the analogous prior art. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:36 am
Average processing time 30 days. 8:58 Iraq licensing stats -- 112 applications, 76 approved, 36 RWA'd, 0 denied. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 1:00 pm
As scheduling would have it, these two teams then played each other on the following weekend, September 16, 2006, and Louisiana Tech in fact won by 10 points.Since these games all took part on consecutive weekends in the early part of the football season and arguably reflected the relative strengths of the teams at that time, unaffected by later improvement or weakening in the course of the season, we thought that Louisiana Tech might be one of those rare teams that plays to… [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 7:59 am
A period of temporary absences of any of the mentioned persons is part of the period. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 1:15 am
A first version appeared, under the same title, in a 1993 issue of Aspects of Education (University of Hull, England), number 49, pages 76 - 80. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 8:11 pm
The Administration's own bill today lists 27 specific forms of conduct that we ourselves will consider "war crimes" triable by military commission (pages 65-76). [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 10:01 am
I don't want to leave the impression that the Ninth Circuit's decision in Abatie is a wacky or fringe decision, or that I think that myself. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
It found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act by: bypassing Communications Workers Local 1108 and dealing directly with employees by promising them promotions to managerial positions so they would no longer be part of the unit, and informing employees that their transfer requests were denied because they were shop stewards; urging employees to sign a petition to decertify the Union, and bypassing the Union and dealing directly with employees by promising them wage… [read post]
Pesadilla IV: el problema de la cláusula transitoria octava y la legislación delegada preexistente
14 Aug 2006, 6:52 am
En realidad, la cuarta prórroga.Todo parte de la Cláusula Transitoria Octava. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 5:31 pm
¿Quieren saber qué dice la nueva reglamentación de los DNUs, que llega poco antes de que la apaguemos la velita numero 12 a la Constitución de 1994? [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Hixon, 76 Ga. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am
I don’t think that such is the law as it stands: see also the review of this book by Karin Oellers-Frahm in the German Yearbook of International Law 47 (2004), pp. 972, 975-76).The Supreme Court is also quite right in saying that the ICJ is not itself bound by its own precedents (Article 38 (1) (d) in fine of the Statute).However, states are bound by Article 94 (1) of the UN Charter (always read with Article 59 of the ICJ Statute) ‘to comply with the decision of the [ICJ] in any… [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United Kingdom, supra, at para. 76), if the classification of relevant material was ordered in good faith. [read post]
18 May 2006, 5:18 am
In those systems, the Defence has access - at least in principle and at some point of the proceedings - to the complete case file prepared by the Prosecution and/or the investigating Judge.In the adversarial system, on the other hand, each party first and foremost collects evidence for its own use, but both parties are under an obligation to disclose certain parts of the evidence in their possession to the other party. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
While the judgment of Collins J of 13 December 2005 is mainly concerned with fine questions of construction of the British Nationality Act 1981, it does make fascinating reading in some parts. [read post]
10 Apr 2006, 5:31 pm
Si bien se mira, allà aparece el núcleo del problema que me proponÃa señalar, y que ya habÃa adelantado: hay una contingencia procesal que aparecerá vinculante para el juez pero que la parte no puede controvertir, pues es sólo arbitrio del fiscal. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 3:46 am
Part II of the Opinion establishes a general distinction between actions in rem and actions in personam. [read post]
