Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 3441 - 3460 of 8,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 4:35 am by Shane Smith
In South Carolina, the case on point is South Carolina Electric & Gas Company v.... . [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, heard 1, 2 and 6 July 2015 (Haddon-Cave J). [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:25 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its highly anticipated decision in Stuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am by Larry
They show the truth of the old adage that bad facts make bad law.The first is United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Local authorities are coining it in, in a short-sighted race for cash by ‘regenerating’ social housing. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
The Ninth Circuit just handed down a partial victory for the NCAA in its antitrust case, O’Bannon v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Reconciling the International Legal Norms of Investment Protection and Political ParticipationNotesJosé Alberro, Estimating Damages Using DCF: From Free Cash Flow to the Firm to Free Cash Flow to Equity (and Back)Jean-Christophe Honlet, Recent decisions on third-party funding in investment arbitrationMatthew Coleman & Thomas Innes, Provisional Measures During Suspension of ICSID ProceedingsGrant Hanessian & Kabir Duggal, The 2015 Indian Model BIT: Is This Change… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
  As the story unfolds and details the Korematsu litigation, Cash is faced with exactly that decision – one that certainly calls to mind Dale Carpenter’s account of Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Patents The 1949 Act, which was a masterpiece of simplicity, had a couple of provisions that always seemed to me to be quite advanced: one was the facility to get an extension of term if exploitation of the patent had not turned out to be profitable on account of the War or if there had been other genuine reasons for not being able to cash in on it. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court referred three questions to the CJEU: Is the care component of the UK’s Disability Living Allowance properly classified as an invalidity rather than a cash sickness benefit for the purpose of Regulation No 1408/71? [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:52 am by Charles Sartain
The original offer had two material terms, a cash commission and the back in. [read post]