Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
As with many old Texas cases, the state is still litigating in Hood the consequences of instructing juries in accordance with a statute the Supreme Court expressly upheld in Jurek v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am by Tobias Thienel
Like her, the Court dismissed the McLeod case, the Rainbow Warrior affair and a reasonably well-known statement by the Appeals Chamber of the ICTY (The Prosecutor v Tihomir Blaskic, Objection to the Issue of a Subpoena Duces Tecum, para 38) as authorities for a wider immunity. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
A guest post on the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Palomo Sànchez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
The action set out detailed factual findings and concluded that "[o]ne of ordinary skill in the art . . . would have been motivated to provide the [first reference device] with a [second reference's filter having a particular flow passage configuration] since [the second reference] states . . . that such filters 'have a very high mechanical stability and a relatively high insensitivity to impact, as can happen during transport and assembly,' 'remain operative for a… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
He stated that the wealthy marks, known in chambers as "snob-marks", have been around for hundreds of years and exist today, and these marks try to show off all the time and shout the loudest about others "free-riding" off their esteem. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:40 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court today, for the first time, will consider what is the correct test in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Elizabeth Allan, Scott R. Anderson
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
The application which came before me, on 22 July 2016 not long before 1700 hours in chambers, was for interim suspension of the warrant. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s January 12, 2018 order in the case of Raymond James Lucia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). [read post]