Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
For example, in the English case of Boys v Chaplin, the House of Lords was unable to provide a coherent ratio decidendi due to differing opinions regarding the law applicable to torts when applying English law to heads of damages. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  As is well known, First Amendment protection extends to expressive conduct such as flag burning (see, eg, United States v Eichman 496 US 310 (1990)) and to conduct which is grossly offensive – such as demonstrators in Nazi uniforms marching through a Jewish community (Smith v Collin 439 U.S. 916 (1978)). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am by Susan Hennessey
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
  This divergence of opinion could lead to conflicting decisions between member states. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:24 am
 Is the Hospira v Genentech case justthe first of many biosimilar cases to come before the English Court? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by New Books Script
K 5410 T6 L65 2011 Transnational torture : law, violence, and state power in the United States and India Jinee Lokaneeta. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, in 2010, the state of South Australia sought to prosecute ‘Mr P’ for two rapes of his then wife in 1963 (R v P, GA (2010) 109 SASR 1). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, in 2010, the state of South Australia sought to prosecute ‘Mr P’ for two rapes of his then wife in 1963 (R v P, GA (2010) 109 SASR 1). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]