Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 7,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2015, 2:53 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
Rule 45, para 1 enables the governor of the prison to arrange for the prisoner to be segregated and para 2 states that the prisoner shall not be segregated for more than 72 hours without the authority of the Secretary of State and the authority given shall be for a period not exceeding 14 days. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm
No wonder the Warner Music Group wanted to keep the most recognized song in the English language out of there. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Godard v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Today, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments in ClearCorrect v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:10 am
The judgment (DiCaprio v Oops!) [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:16 am
In ProBuild v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
” The question for the court was the extent of the connection required between a foreign company and the UK to entitle an English court to wind it up, if its centre of main interests was in another member state of the European Union. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Without that, it is hard to see how Arnold J can still apply the reliance test favoured by the English courts. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
Moroccanoil … but no fishy oil forfeit The Moroccanoil case (Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd[2014] EWHC 1686 (IPEC)), by contrast, shows the weaknesses of English law when a brand owner doesn’t plan ahead and finds itself without any registered trade marks to rely upon. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
United States, got in the way too. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
The parties accepted this construction and Lord Carnwath observed at para 20 that the French and Spanish versions are equally authentic to the English text. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Guindon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Further, the Supreme Court stated that “[g]overnmental or private policies are not contrary to the disparate-impact requirement unless they are artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm
United States: In plain English and with plain logic, Justice Jackson explains why Korematsu's encampment was unconstitutional and dangerous.4. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 2:16 am
In addition, the contract also stated that all proceedings were to be brought in England. [read post]
