Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 11,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
In this event, the legal burden reverts to the propounder.[43] As noted by Garson J.A. in York, the testamentary capacity test is set out in the leading English case: Banks v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
The issue of anonymity orders in defamation claims has also arisen recently in the English case of ZAM v CFW ([2013] EWHC 662 (QB)). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan is arguably a case which has been waiting to happen for years. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
The D.A. has a transcription of the interrogation which has been translated into English. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:35 am
All I can figure is that the words "was of no weight whatsoever and unworthy of credence" were simply left in there from an earlier draft.Or else I simply cannot understand proper English sentences anymore. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
This was considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union earlier this month in an appeal involving Red Bull and Asolo.BackgroundOn 24 September 1997 Asolo filed an application for registration of a European Union trade mark for the word sign ‘FLÜGEL’ [translates to 'wing' in English] in class 32 (Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for the preparation of drinks) and… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:34 pm
” Rag, MerriamWebster Dictionary, https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/rag (last visited May 29, 2018); accord Rag, Oxford English Dictionary, http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/157425 (last visited May 29, 2018). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:59 am
Cases such as Conversant vs ZTE/Huawei, Philips vs TCL, TQ Delta v ZyXel or Optis v Apple pertain equally to the licensing of standard essential patents. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
Therefore, Flexsys was not entitled to the declaratory relief claimed.Although Flexsys v XL Insurance demonstrates an English court's interpretation of a drop down clause the judge was careful to note that there was no single universally applied form of words and that each clause must be looked at on its own merits. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:56 pm
The Supreme Court's observations in JK Industries v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:49 am
-based businesses,” AutoZone Parts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
” In Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:18 am
Tinker v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
.” In Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:13 am
In Jonathan Smyth v St Andrew's Insurance plc [2012] EWHC 2511 (QB) Mr John Randall QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) held that defendant insurers (St Andrew's) had failed to establish that the claimant's (Smyth) partner had deliberately started a fire which had caused extensive damage to Smyth's property, and thus St Andrews could not avail itself of a clause in the relevant insurance policy which excluded damage caused by Smyth's "family".The… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
For a case that the Court of Justice of the European Communities has yet to hear, Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by the IPKat here and later here) has generated a surprising degree of interest. [read post]
