Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 11,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2018, 4:20 pm
This Post includes information (English, Castellano, Français) for the Invitation to open multi-stakeholder consultation with the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights.During its 20th session (14 – 18 May 2018), the Working Group on Business and Human Rights will hold an open multi-stakeholder consultation to inform the Working Group’s report to the 2018 General Assembly. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:55 am
Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit left the question open in 2002 (Virtual Countries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:09 am
Their decision basically was “can’t you plaintiffs read English? [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:22 am
Katfriend Jacob Tesch reports on this panel which discussed Performing Rights Organisations, potential copyright reforms in the field (Music Modernisation Act, the Classics Act and the Allocation for Music Producers Act) and the High Court of England and Wales decision in Gloucester Place Music v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Rex v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:15 am
https://t.co/1n8skAdfS1 2018-04-29 Email contract formed where acceptance is received Murray Market Development Inc. v Casa Cubana, 2018 BCSC 565 https://t.co/cJaMLEU63o 2018-04-29 Kodi shutdown fears – Court case could kill this popular add-on service https://t.co/xoLlmjxl20 2018-04-29 OPINION: Liberals should right copyright wrongs https://t.co/hJ76Ngq8Ha 2018-04-29 Sign-Up Buttons Alone Don’t Bind Users to Sign-In-Wraps https://t.co/C4BML28nfl 2018-04-29 Update on South… [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 10:22 am
Finally, the Court highlighted that Sony had not improved on this position during litigation, for example by clearly demonstrating that it was willing to take a licence.SummaryOnly last month, the English Patents Court was hearing arguments in the case of Conversant v ZTE about the Chinese courts’ familiarity with FRAND proceedings (see IPKat report here), in connection with a jurisdiction challenge. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
” The relevance of 19th-century cases on patents, such as McCormick v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am
Another Facebook Reversal The Court of Appeals of Iowa issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:14 am
” 3 Borrows, John, “Foreword: Indigenous Law, Lands, and Literature,” (2016) 33 Windsor YB Access to Just v at ix. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm
” But obviously to do a plain English and/or anonymised version for all family cases would be a considerable extra burden. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:02 am
In the Sessions v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court ruled in OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:51 pm
Here’s how the two bills stack up against each other: Opt-In v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:16 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
This is the question that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been asked to address in Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff, C-161/17.This morning Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his Opinion[not yet available in English], and answered in the negative.Let’s see what happened.BackgroundWell, the background is quite ... ridiculous (in the sense that it is ridiculous that litigation is brought in the first place in instances like… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:11 am
Early cases, such as the 1803 Runkle v. [read post]
