Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 5,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court determined that the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm
In fact, a part of me hoped (against hope) that the Indian nominee is not elected, in the hope that this would reform, to whate [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:28 pm
This is part of the Delaware State Police’s Sex Offender Apprehension and Registration Unit’s (SOAR) ongoing effort to ensure our sex offender population is doing what they are legally required to do. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:12 am
“The government therefore has not established that those acts—whatever they may be—would give rise to forfeiture both under Curaçao law and federal law were they committed in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
From the Frenemy Press comes this story in Pakistan’s Express Tribune on the “logjam” between the United States and Pakistan over the issue of a formal American apology for the NATO airstrike that killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers last November: The formal apology is one of the key preconditions set by Pakistan’s parliament to revive cooperation with the US and reopen Nato supply routes blocked since the airstrike at Salala which killed two dozen Pakistan… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
Bullying and Students With Disabilities The United States Department of Education has defined disability harassment as "intimidation or abusive behavior based on [ 779 F.Supp.2d 303 ] disability that creates a hostile environment. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
US Patent Office Seeks to Modify Appeals Rules… AgainThe United States Patent and Trademark Office earlier today announced in the Federal Register that they will once again attempt to modify the rules of practice and procedure in ex parte appeals before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
” The ex-president would remember what to do. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
I’ve blogged before that I’m not aware of ANY court in any American jurisdiction ever holding that child labor laws violate a constitutional right to economic freedom or “liberty of contract”, and no one has written in to correct me (for examples of state courts upholding child labor laws within a few years of the Lochner decision, see Ex Parte Weber, 149 Cal. 392 (1906); United Steel Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm
I’ve blogged before that I’m not aware of ANY court in any American jurisdiction ever holding that child labor laws violate a constitutional right to economic freedom or “liberty of contract”, and no one has written in to correct me (for examples of state courts upholding child labor laws within a few years of the Lochner decision, see Ex Parte Weber, 149 Cal. 392 (1906); United Steel Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Wedemeyer, Letter Order, Headquarters, United States Forces, China Theater, Regulations Governing the Trial of War Criminals, Jan. 21, 1946 (File No. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Wedemeyer, Letter Order, Headquarters, United States Forces, China Theater, Regulations Governing the Trial of War Criminals, Jan. 21, 1946 (File No. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:14 pm
The defendants in Black noted that Black had been convicted for mail fraud and was serving a sentence in the United States and pointed to ongoing civil actions by Hollinger in Delaware and Illinois. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
See State ex. rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Ex parte TRO equivalent; then an inter partes proceeding, at which injunctive relief is refused. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm
Whether the restrictions outlined in the Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order were in violation of the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.Holdings: The Court found that the ex parte TRO was issued in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Rule 65 of the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure and reversed.Justice Golden delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
