Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 3441 - 3460 of 15,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Franks’ book was going to press, the Supreme Court granted cert in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Sun’s explanation disregards the seminal 2016 Supreme Court judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (known as the “celebrity threesome” case), in which the private information that a high-profile public figure (known only as PJS) sought to protect through an injunction had already been widely circulated in other jurisdictions – similar to the story concerning Stokes and his family. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
Further, these actions were reasonable under the factors in Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:51 am by Ilya Somin
That figure is likely to decline greatly when the 2017 law takes effect, because—among other things—it doubles the standard deduction. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
This would be decided on the circumstances of the case and it is not valid to suggest that public figures should expect less privacy as a justification for an intrusion on their private lives (Eady J in Mosley v NGN [2008] EWHC 1777).In the UK the Data Protection Act 2018 (the UK’s implementation of the GDPR) provides protection for the processing of personal data. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  As at the date of this blog, Google claims to have received 102,151 requests from the UK alone in respect of 450,868 URLs (the respective figures for requests across all EU member states are 846,327 and 3.3 million). [read post]