Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 16,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
In Lujan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm
The RCMP stopped him and issued a fine of $240, costs and the victim surcharge levy. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:44 am
Among those was the case of EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Wanda Vázquez Garced, firmó la Orden Ejecutiva Núm. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
Italian data protection authority, the Garante, has announced an 11.5 million euro fine against gas and electric company Eni Gas e Luce for violations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Pennsylvania and Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
"The petitioner in the Washington case, Peter Chiafolo, was elected as a presidential elector when Hillary Clinton won that state’s popular vote in 2016 but voted for Colin Powell instead, which led to a $1,000 fine for violating a state law that required him to vote for the presidential and vice-presidential candidates who won the majority of the popular votes. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
In Chiafolo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court will review Barr v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
A violator can be fined up to $10,000 per call. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Swayne similarly was accused of imprisoning and fining lawyers without proper authority, as well as spending the majority of the year outside of his district. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:31 am
Frazier v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:01 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Babb v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm
Supreme Court's 1971 decision of Reed v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:03 pm
In other words, the number has to be downright insane.Prior to the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Koleske, Editor, 1995, pages 23-25D6: BYK Additives & Instruments, Product Guide L-G 1, Paint Additives, February 2009D7: WO 2011/084380 A1.V. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
The first case on the agenda is Kelly v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
If the government does not feel like an $100 order that's probably never going to be paid anyway isn't worth "a bus trip from juvenile camp to court for a hearing that may, perhaps, result in a lessening of a restitution fine" or "appointed counsel" therein, it can easily avoid all that with a stipulated reversal of the trifle about which the law does not care.So, yes, it's silly to have huge fights about things that are systemically irrelevant. [read post]
