Search for: "Green v. State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 6:37 pm by Amy Howe
The newest case on the justices’ merits docket for the fall is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Miller, 10-851, which it looks like it’s been holding for Greene v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
And I learned that just on Tuesday the court lifted the competition law-based injunction, but hasn't stated the reasons yet.That one is a sideshow (deceptive advertising) of a sideshow (a fake patent injunction that had no serious impact), while the one that really matters is the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:55 am by Vera Ranieri
Where patent issues will be heard is also at issue in another Supreme Court case: Oil States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am by Karen Gullo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the border search case U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ryan v Green, 58 NY 304, the Appellate Division opined that "[P]hysical impossibility is not the incompatibility of the common law, which existing, one office is ipso factovacated by accepting another. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ryan v Green, 58 NY 304, the Appellate Division opined that "[P]hysical impossibility is not the incompatibility of the common law, which existing, one office is ipso factovacated by accepting another. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm by cdw
Leading off this edition is the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
Please reach out to an attorney at Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., to ensure compliance with the unique requirements of your state. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Greene labels a few of the most odious Supreme Court decisions—Dred Scott v. [read post]