Search for: "Head v State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 14,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 1:37 pm by Giles Peaker
KKM traced this definition back to section 12 of the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act 1920, and Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson [1949] Ch 707, in particular a passage of the judgment of Evershed MR, stating, somewhat impenetrably there you would have a case in which a head lessor would be suing for possession against a sub-tenant, and the Act of 1920 makes provision by s. 5, sub-s. 5 , and s. 15, sub-s. 3 , for preserving the… [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue has divided lower federal and state courts, and the case of King v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 9:21 am
The Oregon Court of Appeals took on this question in Motsinger v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Stephen Taeusch, Daniel Turinsky, and Carsten Reichel; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/01/what-to-know-about-noncompete-agreements-in-2024 As we head into 2024, employers can expect more risk related to the use of restrictive covenants at both the federal and state level. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 505-06, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:53 am by Russ Bensing
Nothing else, and no oral arguments in any criminal cases scheduled until October, so let’s head over to the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:21 am by Race to the Bottom
” Id.On the heels of whistleblower complaints levied against Twitter from their former head of security Peiter Zatko, Musk’s arguments have gained traction. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Matters came to a head in the Supreme Court in 2012 in Pomiechowski v Poland [2012] 1 WLR 1604, when this Court decried the unfairness of the system and strove to find a more sustainable way around it. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
(It violates Due Process to apply one state's law to a nationwide class when most class members had no relationship to that one state.)General Telephone v. [read post]