Search for: "High v State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 35,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am by SHG
“It would be the ultimate high-risk gathering. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:18 am by Alexandre Miura
CIPA will hold their Congress on 15 September 2022 from 8:00am to 7:00pm (BST), with a stimulating programme including high-profile keynote speakers and topical panel discussions in which members can share their expertise. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Surmounting the high bar to amend the Constitution is, of course, the elephant in the room. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, it almost had that High Chancellor Adam Sutler look from V for Vendetta. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United… [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm by INFORRM
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Fog Reveal is also “ideal for tipping and cueing,” which means using low-resolution, dragnet surveillance to decide where to perform more targeted, high-resolution monitoring. [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]