Search for: "Holland "
Results 3441 - 3460
of 5,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am
(IPBiz) US: Patent protection for the BRCA1 gene and genetic diagnostic methods in the USA: AMP v USPTO (JIPLP) US: Marking with an unenforceable patent does not create intent to deceive: Hollander v Hospira (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US: Regenerative Sciences lawsuit update and FDA’s attempt to broaden the definition of “interstate commerce”: USA v Regenerative Sciences (FDA Law Blog) Products Embeda (Morphine, Naltrexone) – US: Pfizer, Alpha… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 11:15 am
Holland & Knight is #10 on the overall list, with 313 people reported laid off, and Clifford Chance is #10 on the staff-only list, with 201. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
This book was written by Maarten Roos, a Holland trained lawyer who practices in Shanghai. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
In August 2007, Arilco Holland was declared isolvent. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
"That's not to say that Americans want to abolish the death penalty entirely," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Five of our favorite comments from yesterday are: Brooks Holland – Albert Florence’s claim that he should not have been strip-searched at two county jails absent reasonable suspicion presents the kind of security-privacy debate we expect from a Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
Holland? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:23 pm
One of the more touching stories from the latest issue of New York Metro Super Lawyers magazine involves Andrew "Duke" Maloney III's pro bono representation of the family of Holland & Knight partner Glenn Winuk, who died on Sept. 11, 2001. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:23 pm
One of the more touching stories from the latest issue of New York Metro Super Lawyers magazine involves Andrew "Duke" Maloney III's pro bono representation of the family of Holland & Knight partner Glenn Winuk, who died on Sept. 11, 2001. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
Facing a variety of guidelines, a constant flux of new client intake activity and diverse (and sometimes decentralized) procedures, prudent firms can work to limit their risk by taking steps including: In this session, panelists from : Holland & Knight, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, and McKenna Long & Aldridge will explore topics including: Establishing a firm committee or designee to review all OCGs before they are accepted Keeping OCGs in an accessible repository, available… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:28 am
Hollander v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Whether criminal charges were brought against the school bus driver, Alice Davis Holland, and an assistant, Mary Alice Evans is not clear at this time. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
My guess is that the respectable Dutch have--well, I wouldn't say "gloried in her demise," but certainly profited from her affecting narrative, because it does so much to cast the whole story of Hollanders under the Nazis in a sympathetic light. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm
Lessman Katz joins Gordon, Feinblatt – by Wayne Countryman Martha Lessman Katz has joined Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, of Baltimore, as a member of the firm’s intellectual property & technology and business law practice groups. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:52 am
Elizabeth Holland (Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, Harvard University) has posted Holder v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:36 pm
[Link] Holland & Hart is searching for an administrative IP specialist/Secretary. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
However, courts have sometimes noted egregious attorney misconduct, on the part of both defense counsel (Holland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
Jesse Holland of the Associated Press reports that the Court “appeared sharply divided” at argument, while Nina Totenberg of NPR describes the as turning “intellectual somersaults” in grappling with the case. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:54 am
Holland of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Count on Tuesday seemed deeply divided on how far the government can intrude inside the employment practices of churches and religious groups, a decision being closely watched by religious institutions concerned about their independence and by civil rights groups looking out for their employees. [read post]
