Search for: "House v. House" Results 3441 - 3460 of 41,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 7:45 am by Wendy
For those of you interested in which cases were chosen, the list is below: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
Marshall, which memorably opened with Chief Justice Roberts quoting from Bleak House. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am by Giles Peaker
On the Housing Act point and the issue of fact finding, Bubb v Wandsworth LBC  (2011) EWCA Civ 1285 remained binding authority that the county court cannot decide disputed facts in a s.204 appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
This was originally temporary accommodation provided under s.188 Housing Act 1996, but following Lewisham accepting the full housing duty, it became accommodation provided under s.193 HA 1996. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Hackney v Haque [2017] EWCA Civ 4 In which the Court of Appeal grapple with the application of the Public Sector Equality Duty to decisions on suitability of accommodation provided under s.193 Housing Act 1996 (in satisfaction of the full housing duty). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
Chai Lifeline, Inc. v Township of Mahwah, 2014 WL 4288927 (NJ Sup. 5/29/2014) Filed under: Current Caselaw, Family Tagged: Chai Lifeline, family, Inc., Mahwah Township Zoning Board, Township of Mahwah [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
Chai Lifeline, Inc. v Township of Mahwah, 2014 WL 4288927 (NJ Sup. 5/29/2014) Filed under: Current Caselaw, Family Tagged: Chai Lifeline, family, Inc., Mahwah Township Zoning Board, Township of Mahwah [read post]
The 27 elite attorneys included Phil Lacovara, former Watergate Prosecutor and the United States’ winning Supreme Court advocate in United States v Nixon.In a comprehensive, carefully researched “bill of particulars,” the 37-page ethics complaint lays out a 16-month pattern and practice of “conduct unbecoming a member of the bar” during Barr’s tenure under President Donald Trump. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Giles Peaker
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:26 am by Dave
  The House of Lords in R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begum (1993) AC 509 (linked with Garlick, in which it was argued that an application could be made by minors) held that a person had to have capacity to “comprehend or evaluate” an offer of accommodation and could not be treated as a person in priority need. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am by Melanie Fontes
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:48 am by Robert Brammer
H.R.1 An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 7. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm by David Lat
A Washington Lawyer Salary Survey Money v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:09 am by Rachel Lynn Foley
Debtor testified as to having medical problems and house repair issues but the Court was not convinced her issues limited her ability to generate income sufficient to repay her student loans.Date of opinion: 12/12/08For full opinion click here. [read post]