Search for: "In the Matter of Scott"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 7,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 9:41 am
Patrick Scott (AOC / AZ Supreme Court), and Attorney / Judge Pro Tem Debbie Weecks. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
We stand ready to defend if he does, but for now consider this matter to be over. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
I can’t believe that this is the hill that Ed Whelan and Greg Weiner really want to fight on, but I am prepared to defend the high ground: the original meaning of the “judicial power” included the power to declare laws “null and void” and, as a co-equal branch of government, the concurrence of the judiciary on the constitutionality of a law is needed when the law is properly challenged by a member of We the People. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 8:12 am
Given that both the EFF and its adversary appear to be motivated by matters of principle, this dispute has the potential to run and run.The IP Enforcement Directive: an event. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:09 am
Not yet, anyway.So I was pleased to see that the NYT had a new article, "Unions Subdued, Scott Walker Turns to Tenure at Wisconsin Colleges. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
“The matter is simple. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
When talking about estate planning, we often get all twisted up in the mechanisms (revocable living trusts, wills, death taxes, etc.). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:10 am
’” Thus, explaining that although an employer is entitled to have a no-headwear policy as an ordinary matter, when an applicant requires an accommodation as an aspect of religious practice, “it is no response that the subsequent ‘fail[ure] . . . to hire’ was due to an otherwise-neutral policy. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
A Board of Appeal was subsequently constituted, the members of which included a Mr Anthony Scott. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am
American Indians were also part of the Dred Scott decision in 1857, but in a much different way. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
” In addition, as a practical matter, judges are still reliant on assistance from the other branches of government in enforcing most of their rulings. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
If you’re interested, you can find the briefs here, but let me quote my students’ and my amicus brief in the case, filed through the UCLA Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:26 am
The recent lawsuit was filed against Scott Jaffe, his wife, Debra Jaffe, and the Uptown Diner LLC. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:56 am
For more information on this or other Venture Capital or Private Equity matter, please contact: Carl H. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Private Ordering and the Proxy Access Debate by Lucian Bebchuk and Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum here). [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am
If the matter ever came to before the courts one issue examined would be the nature of any “exacting review” undertaken by MPs into the necessity of extending these powers. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Pennsylvania, Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
United States – holding that where a juror has communicated with a third party “about the matter pending before the jury,” an evidentiary hearing must be held to determine the prejudicial impact of the communication – was an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court’s clearly established law. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:00 am
Scott, 356 N.C. 591, 598-99 (2002) (ordering trial court upon remand to sentence defendant for habitual DWI charge that trial court dismissed after the jury’s guilty verdict). [read post]
