Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 3441 - 3460 of 7,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by Frank Pasquale
 1) From Federal to Private Lending: Out of the Frying Pan, Into the FirePrivate lenders are sure to be pleased by the editorial. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (briefly) reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:07 am by Robert Loeb, Matthew Weybrecht
There are a number of potential legal issues about this hacking attack, but we will briefly raise three: (1) criminal liability for the hacker; (2) civil liability for Verizon or AOL; and (3) the need for greater protection for federal officials. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
For example, the British Parliament’s “land tax” imposed rates, not only on real property and associated hereditments, but on (1) debts due to the taxpayer, (2) business and personal chattels, and (3) earnings, pensions, and annuities sourced from public funds. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in a media law case is outstanding: Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, heard 1, 2 and 6 July 2015 (Haddon-Cave J). [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  As the Supreme Court has pointed out “the European court does not often articulate clear principles explaining when damages should be awarded or how they should be measured. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
A medical officer employed by DHS testified that due to the hunger strike, the detainees’ health had deteriorated to the point where ICE had three options: 1) let them die; 2) administer involuntary nutrition; or 3) release the hunger strikers. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's what I'd call the money quote in the story:What appears to happen during this time—the years I look at are 1994 to 2008, just based on the data that’s available—is that the probability that a district attorney files a felony charge against an arrestee goes from about 1 in 3, to 2 in 3. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Wolf's critique of her piece, and of what I am quoted as saying in it.1. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am by Edward A. Fallone
”(2) Critics of Justice Roberts’ reasoning accuse him of being activist [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:17 am by Robin Shea
You will see that it suffers from (1) a too-abbreviated review period, (2) a biased reviewer, (3) grade inflation, and (4) a grossly unrealistically positive view of the merits of the husband, John. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That number is still meaningless out of context, but the point here is that Trump is simply following the Republican playbook by (1) treating the national debt as a reliable scare tactic, and (2) exaggerating the numbers without giving any sense of why anyone should actually care. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am by Stephen Griffin
In my last post, I suggested that in order to understand how constitutional change in the U.S. has happened, we need to move away from the simple model that assumes uniform amendment difficulty across time and appreciate the relevance of three inquiries: (1) how to conceptualize the baseline against which we measure subsequent constitutional change; (2) why it was exceedingly unlikely that change could occur through formal amendment, especially during and after the New Deal; and… [read post]