Search for: "Key v State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 22,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:35 am by Steven Eversole
Cam Ward after receiving drunken-driver report, July 8, 2015, AL.com More Blog Entries: Marks v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
There are still two key employment cases pending this term—Vance v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm by Keith E. Whittington
Virginia has now become the 38th state to vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, which arguably crosses the ratification threshold set out in Article V of the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am by Jennifer Davis
In 1964, she took up the second important case of her career, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The eBay Standard Perhaps the key holding in this decision was the application of the standard set out by the Supreme Court in eBay v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:48 pm
  (The Circuit ruling was in Quilici v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
”Both briefs demonstrate that, if the King v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:43 pm by Alan J. Borsuk
” Watford noted that Screws was a key precedent for the Court in Monroe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Michael Helfand
 One of the key questions post Concecpion was how would state courts react to the decision? [read post]