Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 9:40 am by Robert Horton
  According to the United States Geological Survey, more than 95 percent of those Delta wetlands have been destroyed and new development threatens the remaining tidal wetlands. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
It was the first-ever official meeting with leaders of all four Quad countries: Australia, India, Japan and the United States. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:00 am by Hayley Roberts
’  Article 287(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (LOSC), which both States are party to, requires States to select a preferred means of binding dispute resolution involving third parties, and if they fail to do so, arbitration under Annex VII becomes the default means – unless reservations have been made in writing with regard to optional exceptions (see below). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Such racial cleansings and establishment of “sundown towns” happened across the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
And yet, one click of a button could land you into legal trouble. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
ESA requires agencies considering actions that “may affect” listed species and their habitat to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), specifically created by Congress to monitor and regulate foreign investments that may raise national security concerns, ordered Ralls to sell off the four companies, destroy what it had constructed, and stay off the land. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]