Search for: "Law v. United States" Results 3441 - 3460 of 62,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 10:59 am by Federalist Society
In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held that the United States District Court for the District of Nevada lacked personal jurisdiction over the petitioner. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:59 am by Federalist Society
In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held that the United States District Court for the District of Nevada lacked personal jurisdiction over the petitioner. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick E. Knie
Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was asked to review a case arising in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia that presented a more unique issue. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:29 pm by Mark Theodore
  After all, 25 of the United States are “right to work states,” states which have enacted laws prohibiting compulsory unionism as part of a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Erickson (Tribal Courts; Child Custody) State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:02 am by Unknown
United States (24-291) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Hendrix v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  It reflects a lack of understanding of the governance process, particularly the limits imposed under state law on shareholder authority. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm by Christopher J. Walker
From the website of the Administrative Conference of the United States: The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is pleased to announce a public forum, Recent Administrative Law Developments in the Supreme Court: What’s Next for Agencies? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale  On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]