Search for: "London v. State"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
In the following guest post, ISS Securities Class Action Services and the FOX Williams law jointly report on the current state of play in European Class Actions. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:12 pm
New London is an activist decision; how can the Justices interpret the Takings clause that way? [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Last week in the Courts Judgment was given in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v Keable EA-2019-000733-DA (previously UKEAT/0333/19/DA). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
It is neither stated nor implied in the text. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
Regulation 2(1) of the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 has been successfully invoked in a case involving a different scam (the sending out of letters concerning the renewal of non-existent contracts for the repair and maintenance of printers and faxes), London Borough of Croydon v Austin Hogarth [2011] EWHC 1126 (QB), 5 April 2011 (unreported and not available on BAILII -- but the Kat has a copy if you want to see it). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
The case involved a well-known UK fashion retailer Top Shop – a store synonymous with London cool. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:12 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:30 am
London: 22 March 1686. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
District Judge Jeffrey White ruled in Golinski v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:45 pm
v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:50 am
Dean Spielmann, Judge of the European Court of Human Rights and President of Section V of the Court will deliver the keynote address on 8 June 2012. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:29 pm
However, as Kelo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
The nearly-annual IP Publishers and Editors Lunch, which the recession nearly killed off last year, is back again this year, thanks to the generous hospitality of the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 11:08 pm
Perhaps one of the most eagerly awaited by landlords will be the appeal to the Supreme Court of the case of Edwards v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 am
California 11 March 2015, Case No. 13–cv–04065–VC, Cotter v. [read post]
