Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 3441 - 3460 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
DaimlerChrysler Corp., 644 F.3d 909, 923-24 (9th Cir. 2011), rev’d, 134 S. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:52 am by Trent Dykes
  While the Notice does invite public comment, it only does so with respect to “other types or aspects of virtual currency transactions that should be addressed in future guidance” and that are “not addressed in this [N]otice. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:28 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you don’t itemize your deductions, you may not claim your charitable donations, no matter the amount. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 1:23 pm by Steven Freedman
 Meaning, I’d like to reserve this discussion for a later date. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
 A procedural mess followed, with the case going up to the 9th Circuit, then up to the SCOTUS (on the issue of a bankruptcy court’s power to decide probate matters), then back to the 9th Circuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
Perhaps the most startling of the many such assertions made by author William D. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The holding period is key – and that’s where the ex-dividend matters. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
However, it’s not a matter of simply marking it as zero and calling it a day. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:24 am by Harriet Pearson
§ 45(n), “the FTC’s many public complaints and consent agreements, as well as its public statements and business guidance brochure,” and Wyndham’s own references to “industry standard practices” and “commercially reasonable efforts” regarding data security in its publicly posted privacy policy. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
Joe Neff’s N&Oarticle captured the essence of Cohan’s argument: “something happened” (the author won’t say precisely what), and myriad new Nifong assertions pass either unchallenged or virtually unchallenged. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Read your company’s stock option agreement or stock plan thoroughly and consult with your tax professional – the details matter. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court of Appeal made a number of significant holdings and determinations in rejecting plaintiffs/appellants’ arguments and affirming the trial court’s judgment denying the requested writ of mandate, including: The MMP was not a “mitigation measure” proposed for the rodeo project, and thus did not violate the rule that “’[a]n agency should decide whether a project is eligible for a categorical exemption as part of its preliminary review… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
But more importantly, he saw what was at stake in the fabric of the doctrine, why it mattered. [read post]