Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 3441 - 3460 of 5,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In general, a hearing is required to determine whether a client has cause for discharging an attorney (see Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979; Ulico Cas. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
Waxman apologized, and Justice Kagan started to ask a question, the Chief Justice persisted, “I’m still trying to get to the point of the fact that he was retiring. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by Mandelman
 We need a lot more lawyers like Shawn, but I’m sure glad he’s with us and representing Washington State homeowners. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:06 pm by Adam Thierer
The Risks Posed by New Wiretapping Technologies Daniel Solove & Paul M. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
I’m always skeptical of such broad claims. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm by Daniel Solove
” I will be speaking about my forthcoming paper,The PII Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information, 86 New York University Law Review (forthcomng 2011) (with Paul M. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied without prejudice to… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:05 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Eric J Dirga, PA I’m no expert on appellate law so if you have knowledge to pass on please comment below. [read post]