Search for: "Moring v. State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 130,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
Results revealed that: (1) more than half of participants failed to notice the change between the CI and the perpetrator, (2) among those who failed to notice the change, more misidentified the 'CI' than the 'DI', a pattern that did not hold for those who did notice the change. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am by Matt Danzer
The ACLU and Times Briefs The Times brief begins by arguing that the government’s Glomar response was improper because “[r]evealing the mere existence of legal memoranda would do no more than confirm what is already known – that CIA is interested or involved in the targeted killing program. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision:  Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]