Search for: "Morris's Case" Results 3441 - 3460 of 5,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm by PaulKostro
The leading case in New Jersey on the issue of whether an Internet service provider can be compelled to reveal the identity of one of its subscribers to a party aggrieved by an anonymous Internet posting is Dendrite Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:42 pm by PaulKostro
Although simple preclusion of the expert report was the court’s preferred sanction, that lesser remedy was not workable as a practical matter, because the spoliating party conceded that the natural consequence of preclusion of its expert was that it could not prove its case. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:09 pm by The Recorder
The volume of cases at the court is too big, he said, and most end in settlement. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm by PaulKostro
This does not mean that a judge may not, on proper application and adequate evidence, identify extraordinary expenses appropriately incurred for the activities of the children in a particular case. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:01 pm by PaulKostro
“The court shall not award limited duration alimony as a substitute for permanent alimony in those cases where permanent alimony would otherwise be awarded. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:01 am by PaulKostro
In this case, while defendant’s conduct toward his wife, belittling her appearance and refusing to communicate with her on an equal basis, is unacceptable, it does not equate with the offense of harassment — her recourse lies in an action for divorce, not in a domestic violence restraining order. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:17 am by Christian Stegmaier
The court then issued an order piercing the corporate veil, which made Shou Mei Morris, The Getaway Lounge’s owner, liable for the verdict amount. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am by Dave
The restricted case material was inserted into the 1996 Act (finally) by section 314, Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, in order to deal with the declaration of incompatibility found in R(Morris) v Westminster CC [2006] 1 WLR 505 on the previous provision (disregard of applicant's ineligible child for Part VII). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am by Dave
The restricted case material was inserted into the 1996 Act (finally) by section 314, Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, in order to deal with the declaration of incompatibility found in R(Morris) v Westminster CC [2006] 1 WLR 505 on the previous provision (disregard of applicant's ineligible child for Part VII). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:55 am by PaulKostro
& A. 1943) (noting that the case did not involve “a party’s inadvertent omission to propose an intended provision or stipulation”). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:38 am by PaulKostro
” In alimony cases, the trial judge must analyze the thirteen factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by PaulKostro
My legal and mediation services are offered to Polish-speaking and other clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ; including the municipalities of Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036; Plainfield 07060; Rahway 07065; Summit 07901; Westfield 07090; Berkeley Heights 07922; Clark 07066; Cranford 07016; Hillside 07205; Scotch Plains… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:49 am by PaulKostro
Also, Appendix IX-F provides that: For cases in which the combined net income of the parents is more than $3,600 per week [i.e. $187,200 per year], the child support award at $3,600 represents the minimum basic support award. [read post]