Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Let's look at updates state by state, and then turn to last Thursday's big development in Los Angeles. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:41 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Hacer clic para agrandar imagen Los integrantes de Pro Bono Servicios de Orientación al Inmigrante de la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad de Puerto Rico ofrecerán un taller “brownbag” sobre Temas básicos del Derecho de Inmigración; Los asuntos medulares que todo abogado debe conocer para orientar y representar un cliente inmigrante en casos que no sean de inmigración; y Cambios recientes en Inmigración tal y como… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although the OFCCP’s focus on current pay, rather than on pay decisions does not comport with the relevant legal standard following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (89 EPD 42,827), contractors should still analyze current pay in addition to decisions impacting pay, according to experts speaking at the National Employment Law Institute’s (NELI) Thirty-First Annual Affirmative Action Briefing in Chicago, Illinois.… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm by WSLL
State, 2008 WY 86, 7, 188 P.3d 571, 574 (Wyo. 2008). [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:55 am by WSLL
State, 2008 WY 124, 14, 194 P.3d 299, 303 (Wyo. 2008). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm by Orin Kerr
See ECF No. 38-2 ;¶ 5, 200. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Compare, for example, para 51 of MA with para 3 of this decision. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Compare, for example, para 51 of MA with para 3 of this decision. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]