Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(As an aside at this point, notice how the word "Community" is used in section (g): as most people would understand it. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
E.g., San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
”); see also Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
My people are backed up and jumping down my throat. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:44 am
In the case of Deligans v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:28 am
For much of queer theory, the power of that irrationality and the raw “natural” power in sex renders sex a force and a good around which there should be no or minimal boundaries. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
In People v Kilpatrick, defendant Kwame Kilpatrick challenged the constitutionality of the Michigan statute that allowed the trial court to enter an order requiring that all proceeds from the sale of his book be placed in escrow to pay restitution to the city of Detroit. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
As held in the case of People v Grinberg, chemical analysis is necessary for a prosecution under Vehicle and Traffic Law for driving while ability is impaired by drugs. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
Reich v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:22 pm
Harty v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” Sacrificial days devoted to such creative activities deserve rewards commensurate with the services rendered.2 To put it bluntly: society benefits when creators get paid. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
And indeed, the district court in rendering its judgment makes only passing references to the non-compete's enforceability. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Friday a Hinds County jury rendered a $100,000 verdict Friday in Marble v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
And it was up to the Member States to pass legislation that would render journalists liable for invasions of privacy, and would provide for economic penalties “for publishing groups which systematically invade people’s privacy. [read post]
