Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Riegel, the violation claims were dismissed on non-preemption grounds, and aren't before the Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Class actions in California's state superior courts went down, while class actions in California's federal courts went up. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:42 am
I here and decide these issues in administrative hearings regarding vehicle impoundments and I am often faced with lawyers, respondents and occasionally police personnel who do not understand the three prong Gonzalez test per People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:10 am
Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Superior Court, 39 Cal.3d 740 (1985)). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Of course the Federal Court system has had electronic filing for years through its Pacer system. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
We are a tolerant people, living in a tolerant country. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:58 pm
Cerqueira v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
(Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. [read post]
General reasonable suspicion of driving without a license just because of knowledge of the defendant
29 Dec 2007, 9:16 am
People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Decision of the Day reported on Committee on the Conduct of Attorneys v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
It justified the ruling on the ground that the Pennsylvania Superior Court panels failed to enforce the federal policy favoring enforcement of arbitration agreements. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
In Spikings, the plaintiff filed a motion for certification under Rule 23, and the court found the superiority element required under Rule 23(b)(3) lacking. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed in Pedraza v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 2:45 am
Barbara's Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
