Search for: "R G
v.
G S"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 6,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 3:45 pm
Judge Richard G. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
At a hearing on a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the motion in accordance with C.P.L. 440.30(6) and as was held in People v Tucker, involving a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction based on new evidence pursuant to C.P.L 440.10(1)(g) and People v Tankleff. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Finkelman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
In Legislature v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:55 am
Although he failed to advance his claim that he was discriminatorily denied a supervisory role, he could proceed on his claim that his position was eliminated because of his disability (Chalmers v Intel Corp, February 3, 2014, Snow, G). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
Thus, the court denied the employee’s motion to dismiss (Absolute Energy Solutions LLC v Trosclair, February 3, 2014, Atlas, N). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
Verifique sempre se existe o rótulo de instruções, o lacre sobre a válvula com a marca da companhia de gás e o selo de identificação da Conformidade do Inmetro. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Chaque semaine, nous vous présentons un résumé d’une décision d’un tribunal québécois qui nous est fournis par la Société québécoise d’information juridique (SOQUIJ) et ayant un intérêt pancanadien. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
ADDED: As for spelling and punctuation, from the first link:We resisted the temptation to correct the Supreme Court’s erroneous spelling of M‘Culloch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
CKS’s findings do show that the figures cited in the President’s report are misleading, but, as we shall see, that evidence exists in other sources as well. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:51 am
GKH’s argument that the plain language of section 362(g) of the Bankruptcy Code does not permit a court to alter burdens with regard to the automatic stay did not persuade the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
The employee presented direct evidence of disparaging remarks made by his supervisor about his, and other employees,’ use of leave, raising a question of fact as to whether the discharge decision was motivated by discriminatory animus (Ash v Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC, January 22, 2014, Steeh, G). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:00 pm
Vinson moved to strike G & R’s special employer defense. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
Garcés yRamón. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Par ailleurs, dans R. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Here is Dan’s guest post. [read post]
