Search for: "Scales v. State"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2007, 1:53 am
Kobayashi v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am
No, it’s from one of the opening paragraphs in the 3rd Circuit’s decision last year in US v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
Misinformation has always been with us, but the endemicity of social media and the depth of political polarization in the United States and elsewhere has enabled falsehoods to be amplified, monetized, microtargeted, and spread around the world at unprecedented speed and scale. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
Van Leer v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Smaller-scale interventions have a variety of advantages. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:54 am
Why is a 2-year period necessary, particularly where other implementing States are able to adopt shorter periods? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:58 am
This involved the ongoing case of Scarlet v Sabam in the European Court of Justice. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Efforts to exercise “undue influence” on the election resurfaced on a scale previously unheard of. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
It might be a good idea, but "[with so many individuals and businesses reliant on and affected by copyright, and with so many contentious issues at stake, it would be unwise for the Commission to rush into any changes of this scale or ambition." [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am
The main reason is the widely held belief that the Supreme Court blessed the modern massive prior restraint system in the 1980 case Snepp v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Kansas and Peter v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Lawmakers who are physicians are using their medical backgrounds to persuade colleagues to scale back some of the more restrictive and punitive portions of anti-abortion laws being considered. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:39 am
If ultimately enacted as law, even a scaled-back version of this amendment could significantly alter the Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”) regulatory framework in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
The American position, so they explain, is unforgiving and typified by the decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:38 am
See Pruitt v. [read post]
