Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court ethics are in the news.The organization, "Common Cause," recently asked Attorney General Holder to investigate whether Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas should have recused themselves from Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
Syllabus - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
Syllabus - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
http://katzjustice.com Today, the United States Supreme Court substantially retreated from Crawford v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Even more interesting is the fact that the organizers of these events have ownership interests in several legal cases that have come before the Supreme Court, most recently Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:28 am
The United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Thompson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
In doing so, Judge Holwell, by his own account, joined other courts in "rejecting the argument that a domestic transaction occurs whenever the purchaser or seller resides in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Yet lower courts have read into the language an intent to exempt foreign securities even if the trade occurs in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
The mandate also fails to satisfy an alternative to the substantial effects doctrine that was proposed by Justice Scalia in a concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
If all that mattered was the type of security (US exchange traded), the antifraud provisions would apply even if the transaction took place entirely outside the United States and involved foreign investors. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:01 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
” In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
John Marshall, undoubtedly the greatest chief justice ever, spent his first month on the court as the secretary of state of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
United States, in which a divided Court held (for the second time) that federal regulations promulgated by the U.S. [read post]
