Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 7,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
The restraint called for criminal contempt weighed against this broad interpretation on an interlocutory basis, which formed the core of the motions judge’s decision. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:55 pm
Thales Visionix v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
Tomorrow: the Ninth Circuit’s amended decision applying the “new” Trademark Dilution Revision Act standards in Jada Toys v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:03 pm
Stangvik v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
In Levinson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Lapine v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 2:30 pm
But state law can provide more protection, as Zink v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 12:01 pm
Louis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am
In Dynamex, the court held workers are employees if: His/her job forms part of the company’s core business operations; Bosses direct the way the work is done; The worker has not established an independent trade/business. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:58 am
The lawsuit, Fesser v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am
” And in doing so, the court explained, he would have every incentive to probe as close to the core secrets as the trial judge would permit, which would threaten disclosure of state secrets. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
Beginning in 2012, in Knox v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
Is the activity in question a “core”, “central” or “basic” function of the institution? [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:53 am
Teaching Moore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIn law, perhaps one of the most famous aphorisms is “I know it when I see it”, which Justice Potter Stewart used to describe his threshold test for obscenity (in Jacobellis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Remarkably little for such a core issue. [read post]
