Search for: "State v. Country" Results 3441 - 3460 of 26,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Peter Margulies
In contrast, EO-3 does not assert that any country subject to its restrictions affirmatively encouraged inadmissible foreign nationals to enter the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:30 pm
I'm fairly confident that Judge Kleinfeld gets this one right, and that Jose Valeriano -- a 34-year old Mexican national with three United States citizen children -- isn't entitled to equitable tolling, and hence can and will (and, legally, should) be deported to Mexico. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston lays out the timeline and procedures by which the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry into the United States of foreign nationals from six majority-Muslim countries could make its way before the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
The Hungarian tax authority argued that the aim of its regulation was to secure the economic well-being of the country, as well as to protect the rights of others (i.e., actual and potential business partners of the applicant). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm by Rich McHugh
In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme today held in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Emily Dai
Prisoner returns between the United States and Russia are considered rare because the countries do not have an extradition treaty. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:49 am by Jeremy
That court has jurisdiction only to rule on the damage caused in the Member State within which the court is situated.While the jurisdictional side of the ruling has its upside, the notion that the court has jurisdiction only to rule on the damage caused in the Member State within which the court is situated is a pain if it potentially means separate litigation in each of 28 jurisdictions to recoup damages on a country-by-country basis, particularly if the… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
” Although the destination country in this case was the United States, the close and detailed regulation by the EU represented the claimants’ best hope. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
The sections that were declared void were: Section 3: which states that it is a state crime for an individual to be in the US without proper authorisation; Section 5(C): which states that it is a state crime for unauthorised immigrants to apply for job or to work in Arizona; and Section 6: which allows state law enforcement officials to arrest without a warrant any individual who is otherwise lawfully in the country, if they have probable cause… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:35 am by Deirdre Wheatley-Liss
The most important Elder Law decisions from around the country are summarized here. [read post]