Search for: "State v. London" Results 3441 - 3460 of 3,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
This would prevent judges from åany enticement to lend the prestige of the judicial office to benefit other interests.[122] It would also have the beneficial effect of preventing the appearance of judicial impropriety.[123] . . . . _____________________________ 84 Judiciary of England and Wales, Guide to Judicial Conduct 2013 (London: Judges’ Council, 2013) Acknowledgements at 4 [Guide], onli [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
  The relationship between courts in Edinburgh and London has long been a contentious one. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
A year after it was first announced, the Detainee Inquiry on 6 July published its Protocol and terms of reference. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by William B. Gould IV
That’s the position of the states that are hostile to President Biden, and about half the states of the Union signed on to a brief challenging this rule. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  The recent judgment of Mr Justice Peter Jackson in London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary gives a great discussion of some of the key issues, and I really recommend reading it. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  In realspace – the world of atoms and tangible matter – it’s harder to do business in London if you’re in Lima than it is if you’re in Liverpool, and it’s harder to cause harm in Seattle from Seoul than from Spokane. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]