Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 61,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
C.I.R., 136 T.C. 341 (2011); Virginia Route 231, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
(Karner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
SeeUnited States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 10:16 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 9:33 am
The highest New York state court agrees. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
New York's Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 2009 NY Slip Op 05062, Decided on June 18, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State's Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:08 pm
Dilworth Co., 322 U.S 327 (1944); General Trading Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
In our submission, we address: (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court, (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties, (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking, (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and (v) available remedies against the abuse… [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Therefore the central issue in both the cases under appeal was the interpretation and application of the statutory incompatibility ground of decision identified in the majority judgment in the Supreme Court in R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:28 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
In the case of Kaler v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Such alteration of the devolution settlement cannot be effected by means of the prerogative alone. 14:39: Scoffield QC gives examples of Northern Ireland citizens relying on their EU rights to challenge the actions of the executive. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:28 am
Supreme Court heard argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
