Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 20,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
The Supreme Court held that Gardner v Parker was wrongly decided. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:34 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Hyder, and Burlington v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
On 29 April 2020, the UK Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd & Anor) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16 that the Secretary of State’s guidance prohibiting the local authorities who administer the local government pension scheme from making investments contrary to UK foreign or UK defence policy was unlawful as it did not fall within the power conferred by Parliament on the… [read post]
“No License, No Problem” – Is Qualcomm’s Ninth Circuit Antitrust Victory a Patent Exhaustion Defeat?
1 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
The Patent Exhaustion Doctrine and Chip Sales As the Supreme Court explained in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:37 pm
In Van v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:56 am
While put rights generally are a strong exit mechanism, GMX Technologies v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
This is a necessary risk that comes with the commercial enterprise that seeks to profit over the sale of alcohol. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
McNamara v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 1:22 pm
Co. of Am., and New York Univ. v Continental Ins. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 5:38 am
An example of this occurred in Sunsplash Events Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
Rule 144A provides a safe harbor exemption from registration for the sale or resale of restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers, commonly referred to as “QIBs”. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
Rule 144A provides a safe harbor exemption from registration for the sale or resale of restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers, commonly referred to as “QIBs”. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm
[3] In Delaware (and other states that follow its jurisprudence), there are a few context-specific exceptions, such as in connection with the “sale of control” of a company wh [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:22 am
Simpson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
The absence of tourism affects not only direct employment and investment, but it also affects business (state and non state sector) dependent on tourism, from house renting to dining to guides, trinket sales and the more importantly the domestic sale of "signature" Cuban products (liquor, cigars, art, etc.). [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:38 pm
Read the full article in Tax Notes State. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
