Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Costello v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
For example, a single Supreme Court ruling after enactment of a widely challenged statute might cause some lower courts to alter their rulings if the Justices overturn their position, as the Ninth Circuit had to do when new inter-circuit conflict developed after Congress passed the Sentencing Guidelines Act and the Supreme Court upheld it in Mistretta v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
Embassy still has to prove all of this at the trial court level. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
That happened in 2013, when the Court read its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
Raimondo The Justices will consider whether to overrule the Court’s 1984 precedent in Chevron v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Before the Supreme Court decided Birchfield, it decided Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
When the Supreme Court announced its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Furthermore, in Burwell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
The courtroom is nearly full at the DC Circuit Court of Appeals for oral arguments in Al Laithi v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
The broadcasters argued, among other things, that the Court should overturn its precedent in FCC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:26 am
The Amarillo Court of Appeals sided with Chesapeake, with one justice dissenting. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
This is unusual and welcome for families and family justice. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
Supreme Court precedent, in Dusky v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:43 am
Six of the justices who decided the 1994 case are still on the court. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor to Defense Counsel On January 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In the Public Law Project challenge the courts had to look for the third time at the question whether regulations made under LASPO, though on this occasion still in draft form, were lawful. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:00 am
On Friday afternoon, Judge Goldsmith of the California Superior Court issued his final order in the case pitting environmental justice advocates against the State’s Air Resources Board on the issue of cap and trade (order available here). [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
