Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Accordingly we accept the thrust of Mr Norton-Taylor’s second submission, if not the precise wording. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:26 am
On Friday, Charles Taylor’s defence officially closed its case in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The first test was whether subject of the arbitration claim was prohibited under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law Section 200 et seq.) [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 am
v=M69o5T4aqQ0] For this and more zaniness, drop by my blog, The Reasonably Prudent Law Student. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
Supreme Court should have granted the petition in Proceeding No. 2 to permanently stay arbitration.Comment: The Plattsburgh case [Plattsburgh v Plattsburgh Police Officers Union, 250 AD2d 327, leave to appeal denied: 93 NY2d 807], illustrates this. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
Earlier coverage is in the post, "Cullen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
Retirement benefits based on only an employee’s regular salary and termination pay or other compensation paid in anticipation of retirement excludedDavies v NYS LPFRS, 259 AD2d 912, motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 810A Taylor Law contract negotiated by the City of Corning and its police officers allowed unit members to elect to participate in a “senior officer” program. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:21 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
”The court noted that there were two basic arbitration concepts contained in the Taylor Law:1. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:31 am
” The Appellate Division, noting that Huff had made the same argument “in prior unsuccessful claims,” observed that the applicable Taylor Law contract covers Huff’s employment only during the academic year -- September through the June next following. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
From the Elkhart Truth story of Nov. 5th about the oral argument Nov. 4th in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
In an unanimous verdict, the jury awarded Taylor-Ewing $160,000 in compensatory damages.One of Taylor-Ewing's attorneys, V. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
Taylor – decided on the same day in 2000. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:50 am
LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-3425; USA v. [read post]
