Search for: "True v True"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 33,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
But even here, were it true that the victim was a quarter or so at fault for the accident, I would have abolutely no problem slicing the restitution down to an appropriate amount. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
Though that's not really true. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
It's true that incredibly long footnotes sometimes detract from the flow of an opinion. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
Instead the Court of Appeal gave respondents repeated extensions to file an utterly meritless brief and then took over two months after the oral argument was finished to file a seven-page double-spaced opinion that says stuff that couldn't be more true (and was presumably already written in draft form before the argument).Not the most impressive labor by anyone in this history of the universe. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
But this assertion, even if true, does not disturb the main premise of the question presented: For purposes of constitutional analysis, Buza is no different than any felony arrestee who has not been charged, convicted, or found by a neutral magistrate to be lawfully detained. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:30 pm
If those residual rights make it a burglary to enter your own hotel room, then the same should be true for entering your own apartment (or perhaps your own home, since your lender has residual rights too). [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:17 pm
That's true (in common parlance) even after A's no longer a minor and no longer living in Mom and B's house. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
"No" means no.There are so, so many areas in which this is unambiguously true. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Everplay Installation, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Lufthansa Technik AG v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:34 pm
Williams v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:12 pm
In Martinez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:58 am
This would not be true of a famous mark plus affix, as noted above with RBS and “my” or “i”. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:26 am
Dillon-Watson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:28 am
Most recently demonstrated in Lenz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
The present decision suggests that, at least as regards exclusivity, this prediction has yet to come true. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
I am already wielding this judgment, both in headline and in nuance, and I’m sure the same is true of all of us. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:45 am
See also Higgins v. [read post]
