Search for: "US v. George"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 6,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The materials presented on this site are intended for informational purposes only and should not be used as legal advice applicable to the reader’s specific situation. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
Similarly, without Article V amendment, one could move to multi-member districts and reform gerrymandering practices.The Senate's filibuster and hold rules can be changed by a simple majority, or by the threat of using a simple majority in order to obtain 67 votes for more moderate measures. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
Nominated by President George H.W. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The following was sent to us via email. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
Writing for herself and Sentelle, Judge Janice Brown (also a George W. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
See, e.g., Lee v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
One Parcel of Land in Prince George’s County,6 a federal district court found standing, noting that not only do the federal courts have a right to determine who among competing claimants is entitled to payments of compensation, but also that this the decision may be made as a preliminary matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
By most accounts, when Congress enacted the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, it was authorizing the George W. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
Moss, the Justices unanimously agreed that two Secret Service agents who moved protesters away from President George W. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
You’ve probably heard that in 1971 the Supreme Court reversed Muhammad Ali’s conviction for refusing to be inducted into the Selective Service. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:49 am
Georg Werner) last month, it crystallized that the court's SEP rules were still evolving, for reasons including--but not limited too--the guidance provided by Sisvel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm
Davis, Solem v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 9:16 am
case=2636704330015897292&q=George+Robinson+v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
In Plumhoff v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Trump: How Technology Companies Can Protect Both Customers and National Security, Amitai Etzioni, The George Washington University Who Should Regulate Data? [read post]
