Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 3441 - 3460 of 3,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
McKee claimed the act's release provisions were inadequate to ensure that only those persons with a current mental illness that makes them dangerous to the public continue to be confined.Citing Jones v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
For instance, a decision from the United States Supreme Court would frequently be referred to as Jones v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
"Part of the opinion involves the application of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding what are the "proceeds" of illegal activity for purposes of money laundering, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
June 23, 2008) .................................... 3-4, 15-16 Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
V FOR VENDETTA by Alan Moore and David Lloyd The book is probably one of the best graphic novels ever produced. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:10 am
In contrast, the Eighth Circuit has rejected the duplicative aggravating factor theory when applied to the FDPA, see Purkey, 428 F.3d at 762, and the Fifth Circuit has withdrawn its support of the double-counting theory in light of Jones, see United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 885 So.2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .................5, 15 Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:40 am
It was unclear whether his judge was one of those clueless judges.The deciison in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:18 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeSentence Imposed for Violation of Supervised Release Remanded Due to Omission of Presentence Allocution United States, appellee v. [read post]