Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United Sta [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am
The first was a March 2017 ruling in Leonard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Noting the recent K-Dur decision, the brief goes on to argue that “California law does not permit a patent holder to exclude competition with a naked cash payment so large it casts serious doubt on the patent’s legal ability to exclude. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:06 am
Under that precedent, the analysis was simple: “Here, DHS authorized certain nonimmigrants to work in the United States—just like in Washtech. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am
Until now, the abortion law being practiced in the United States is the Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm
This month, the Attorney General has asked the United States Supreme Court to overturn the First Circuit Court of Appeals’ reasoning and decision in an 2013 appeal before the High Court, United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
The goal of the present law is to fill vacancies in the State Legislature and the United States Senate in a timely manner when such vacancies occur. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(Michael Geist) Copyright Board’s legal history making (Jeremy de Beer) China China’s stunning lack of brands (China Law Blog) How much does a copyright holder get when his content is broadcast in China? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
” Decommissioning liability for RUE holders: Current regulations – BSEE regulations are currently silent concerning decommissioning liability for RUE holders. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
