Search for: "Application of Stevens"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
[9] Thomas Brom, The Price is Right, CALIFORNIA LAWYER (September 1, 2009); Steven G. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
Indeed, in refusing to join the preemption analysis, Justice Stevens expressly stated that he was “not persuaded . . . that Congress’ decision to follow a policy of neutrality in its own legislation is tantamount to a federal prohibition against state legislation designed to provide special protection for incumbent management. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:08 pm
Ginsburg and Sotomayor joined in Stevens' comments. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:45 am
Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, may be made to Lead Counsel: Steven B. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:26 am
"By denying Muhammad's stay application, we have allowed Virginia to truncate our deliberative process on a matter -- involving a death row inmate -- that demands the most careful attention," Stevens wrote in the statement, joined by Sotomayor and Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
District Court by Judge Steven C. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
District Court by Judge Steven C. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:51 pm
Justices Stevens, Ginsburg and Sotomayor issued this statement (pdf), expressing frustration with Virginia for rushing the process: [More...] [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
Further to the "intent" issue, Justice Stevens asked whether the original drafter of the Patent Act had any comments on this issue. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 Further to the "intent" issue, Justice Stevens asked whether the original drafter of the Patent Act had any comments on this issue. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:47 am
Justice John Paul Stevens told Jakes bluntly that "none of our cases" supported his position, but the lawyer did not back down, saying the Court had never addressed one like this. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
Finally, Bilski deals with the difficult issue of convincing the Court that its patent application is patentable. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:25 am
Lippman and Steven H. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Whether it has any real world application is a wholly different matter. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:15 am
"Since 2005, CSLB has conducted background checks on all new applicants, and those adding classifications to their licenses. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
" Lawry responded by offering as a metric for consistent application whether or not the court clearly explained itself. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
†The application noted that Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg protested that practice two years ago. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
By Bob Hockett The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a fascinating case that DoL readers might find particularly interesting in a time of financial turbulence. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:43 pm
” The application noted that Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg protested that practice two years ago. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
Not all carve-outs currently used for commercial properties would necessarily be applicable to, or useful for, residential purchase-money mortgages. [read post]
