Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 6,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 3:45 pm
David v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:31 am
The United States, on behalf of Customs and Border Protection, moved to collect the duties and a penalty of two times the unpaid amount. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 3:21 pm
Acquisition 362, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-marin-county-sheriff For more on ALPRs:https://www.eff.org/pages/automated-license-plate-readers-alpr Contact: press@aclunc.org [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 7:06 pm
In Transpacific Steel LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:14 pm
That is the main take away from SGS Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:23 pm
That resulted in a win for Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 5:30 pm
Or that legal innovators spend too much weekend time at devices A screen shot of follow-up Tweets follows my initiating Tweet. (3) A static screen shot of the Law Catalog that shows the Catalog count of innovations <a href=’http:&#47;&#47;LegalTechInnovation.com’><img alt=’Catalog of Law Firm Innovations v1.0 – Phase 1, v. 1.0 ‘… [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 9:29 am
Marksbury v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
That is the issue in McMesson Canada Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Is it possible that I failed to report on the Court of International Trade decision in GRK Canada, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 10:45 am
.)United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
HereSven tests out the sleepingarrangements ...The case in question is Prosecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) and it runs like this. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:36 am
., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
""While the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016) 593 final) contains a number of reasonable, common sense measures (for example relating to cross border access, out-of-commerce works, and access for the benefit of visually impaired people), there are two provisions that are fundamentally flawed. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
