Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 3461 - 3480 of 11,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
The plaintiffs were harmed prior to 1993.Even though the current version of the statute would indicate that a trustee of a nominee trust could be held liable, the Court held that the definition of "owner" should "not be read out of context and employed to impose liability on one who is effectively an agent for a principal; who possesses "only the barest incidents of ownership," Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:01 am
  After learning of the investigation, PGM conducted and voluntarily disclosed the results of an internal investigation and cooperated with investigators and prosecutors. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
That's called the Miranda warning, a requirement enshrined into law by the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:08 am by INFORRM
  This application was referred to the Grand Chamber and was heard on 13 October 2010 along with Von Hannover v Germany (No.2). [read post]
21 May 2007, 6:25 am
According to the Appellate Term, First Department, in Brontman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
 He wrote the opinion for the Court in the first case I argued, Chisom v. [read post]