Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 3461 - 3480 of 14,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Thus, the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s arguments. (2) During trial, the defendant moved to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence at the close of the State’s case in chief. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” The next day, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died.The majority of this column will discuss the potential chaos that faces the United States in the upcoming elections—chaos that could become much worse in the absence of Justice Ginsburg’s voice and vote. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:31 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Navy command master chief was relieved from his leadership position at Naval Ordnance Test Unit last month, according to officials. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Anna Salvatore
The justices wrote that “federal courts ordinarily should not alter state election rules in the period close to an election” and extolled the benefits of state sovereignty. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:32 am by Derek T. Muller
It cites a free exercise case in South Bay United Pentecostal Church (specifically, Chief Justice John Roberts’s concurring opinion—despite the fact that Justice Kavanaugh would have granted the application in that case but here concurred in the denial.) [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:42 am by Patricia Hughes
Six judges resigned because they did not believe they could perform their responsibilities “‘effectively'”, but others remained, including the chief justice of Australia, who explained the balancing involved in making his decision. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In determining whether to award educational expenses, the court must consider the circumstances of the case, the circumstances of the respective parties, the best interests of the children, and the requirements of justice. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:57 pm by Katie Bart
“I greet most cordially members of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:51 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, both liberal and conservative justices indicated the real limits on that delegation of power. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
In 1993, President Bill Clinton appointed Justice Ginsburg to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 2:36 pm by John Floyd
”   Leadership Fails to Acknowledge Historical Facts   Still, the President of the United States does not believe in systemic racism. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Viviano also indicated that in an appropriate future case, he would consider adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States (2019) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting). [5.] [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm by Peter Margulies
First, referring to Chief Justice John Roberts’s language in Hawaii, White noted that the NIV ban sought to “supplant,” not merely “supplement,” provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:35 pm by Race to the Bottom
(“Anthem”), both major market participants in the United States (“U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am by Margaret Wood
The Law Library of Congress has had a long relationship with the Supreme Court of the United States and its justices. [read post]
Instead, in the United States, those questions are presented first and foremost to the states for resolution—and that makes them the first line of defense in preventing an electoral dispute from becoming a full-fledged constitutional crisis. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jenks, Chief Justice Marshall, interpreting a treaty between the state of Georgia and the Creek Indians, noted that in a contest between those two parties, ambiguity should be resolved in a manner “favourable to the pretension of the less powerful and less intelligent or skilful [sic] party to the compact. [read post]